🔗 Share this article

Just two days before the NYC race for mayor, political analyst Michael Lange made a significant electoral prediction – not just the winner overall, but precinct by precinct. Lange, an expert in elections who grew up in the city, has spent over a decade in left-leaning activism and has become something of a well-known figure this year for his deep dives into municipal statistics and voter surveys.

He released his highly detailed prediction map – accurately predicting that Zohran Mamdani would win although missing the independent candidate’s strong performance – on his Substack, his platform. He possesses a talent for clever terms. He pointed out, as an example, the divide between the “commie corridor”, stretching from one neighborhood to Bushwick to a third locale, where he forecasted (accurately) that Mamdani would triumph by huge margins, and the conservative-leaning zone on affluent parts of Manhattan. In those areas, “the Free Press and Wall Street Journal surpass the mainstream paper” in audience and most voters favored Cuomo, campaigning as a conservative-courting independent.

Election Night Patterns and Unexpected Results

How was your night?

It was necessary because they were adding around 200,000 votes into the system every few minutes! I felt somewhat anxious initially: The candidate led the early vote by a dozen percentage points, but there were two big batches of votes added later and the advantage dropped from 12 to 8%. I was worried.

Understand, there was a world in which election day went kind of poorly for Mamdani, where Cuomo would have essentially increasing his support from the Democratic primary. But the winner gained 500,000 votes to his primary coalition, and this was critical why he won. He campaigned and greatly broadened his support from the primary.

Expanding Support

Where did Mamdani gain those extra votes from?

He built the alliance that the left long aimed for: it’s multiracial, youthful, tenants and it’s people squeezed by affordability. He improved considerably with Black and Hispanic voters, everyday New Yorkers, relative to the primary. Additionally he further maximized his core of liberal progressives, youthful radicals, and Muslims and south Asians. Victory required without expanding his appeal.

He created the alliance that progressives always wanted to build: multiracial, youthful, renters and residents squeezed by affordability

There were also a number of supporters of both candidates – is this significant?

It’s definitely a real thing, confined to Hispanic laborers, Asian communities and Muslims. Voters in ethnic enclaves that supported the former president last year went for Zohran this year. But it’s not that he was winning over Caucasian laborers and Trump loyalists.

Turnout and Effects

One of the big stories of the election was the sky-high turnout. Who did that help?

Both sides. Participation was much greater than anticipated. I figured we might exceed two million, but it’s closer to 2.3M – which is a lot of darn voters. Existed a substantial anti-Mamdani block, who were motivated, but his supporters was also motivated, and that sufficed to secure victory.

You forecasted he’d exceed half the ballots. Is he on course for that?

Right now you would say he’s likely to get over 50%. He has just over 50% but remain around 200,000 votes left to report as of Wednesday morning. So it’s not certain, but I think probable, and I hope he does because then none can claim the Republican was a spoiler.

Republican Collapse

The GOP candidate, the conservative contender, was another surprise. His vote plummeted.

He lost a single precinct in any area. Not even Tottenville in Staten Island, which is like an 88% Trump neighborhood. That really was unexpected. Cuomo kept very white areas, affluent zones and very religiously Jewish areas, and plus gained all of these conservatives on Staten Island who had a high participation. I believe there was significant tactical voting by the Republicans. They were doing it before Trump endorsed for Cuomo, but it assisted. It might have changed the outcome unless Mamdani’s coalition hadn’t grown.

The “Commie Corridor”

What about your often-discussed left-wing base – did backing for Mamdani overwhelming in those parts of Brooklyn and Queens?

I think existed a little dilution of the progressive zone in certain places like neighborhoods that have older Caucasian residents. In Astoria, instance, the property owners and homeowners all went for the independent. Thus there was some opposition. But no, mostly the leftist base is another huge reason why Zohran prevailed – he was polling between 77% and 83% in Fort Greene, Clinton Hill and Bushwick.

Jewish Voters

Prior to the vote there was coverage on if the candidate was making inroads with Jewish New Yorkers. Any indication that he succeeded?

Exist neighborhoods with many secular and more progressive-leaning Jews – such as Park Slope and Morningside Heights – where he performed strongly. However in the affluent districts such as the Upper East Side, his Middle East stance was influential in those places. Likewise in the more middle-class Jewish areas like Queens neighborhoods, or Bronx areas – they favored the independent. Plus, you have newcomers from the former Soviet Union in the borough, who were strongly supportive. Therefore I don’t know if existed crazy narrative-busters on this one, but he retained left-leaning areas and including sections of the another locale by big margins.

Political Impact

Did Mamdani redefine what New York means politically? Will the commie corridor become a launch pad for leftwing candidates?

Absolutely, it’s no coincidence that key political leaders from progressives hail from a few areas in the boroughs. I’m sure that there will be additional examples – candidates will emerge from these neighborhoods to be promoted to higher office.

However I think that every city in America can have similar progressive hubs. Cities are the epicenters of progressive influence in the nation – since youth reside there, tenancy is common and they represent locales where people are crushed by the inequalities we face.